RE: 11.2 dbua is slow
- From: "Mark W. Farnham" <mwf@xxxxxxxx>
- To: <troach@xxxxxxxxx>, <niall.litchfield@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2014 17:40:45 -0400
And while –silent is there for a reason, there is no such thing as interactive
without large graphics.
The actual data that really needs to go back and forth could be handled
reasonably at 300 baud with a satellite latency in the middle of each turn
around.
THEN they decided they had to paint pictures.
mwf
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Thomas Roach
Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2014 4:14 PM
To: niall.litchfield@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Mark W. Farnham; Patrice Boivin; ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: 11.2 dbua is slow
Also sometimes the way X is redirected is slow. Meaning the latency in the
network matters. I've found in these cases that using VNC and running all X
locally on the server can be much faster.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 5, 2014, at 3:58 PM, Niall Litchfield <niall.litchfield@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Mark W. Farnham <mwf@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
(There IS something truly EVIL about a dba-tool that consumes resources on
painting pretty pictures and marketing and has no option to skip the graphics.
OUI, DBUA and DBCA however do not fit that description :) -silent is there for
a reason
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e23633/upgrade.htm#UPGRD12405
There are a number of things that can make an upgrade slow, of which of course
slow remote graphics is one. Unfortunately I don't think we've been given
enough information about where this upgrade was slow to guess accurately at the
issue. https://blogs.oracle.com/upgrade/ (and especially the slide decks) are
an excellent resource for upgrade issues (and indeed planning).
Niall
http://www.orawin.info
Other related posts:
