Re: 10gR2 for solaris (64bit), AIX and HP released
- From: rjamya <rjamya@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: mark.powell@xxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 11:03:47 -0400
Wel also rolled back 9206 to 9204 in 3 days. It consistentely failed on one
query which had a decode on static (non column) values. Since it would have
taken us more time to prepare a test case, we decided to roll back the
patch.
Raj
On 8/31/05, oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>
> >> Special mention of my black list:
> 9.2.0.6 <http://9.2.0.6> with RAC (first time I had to roleback a
> patchset!).<<
> [rollback]
>
>
Other related posts:
- » 10gR2 for solaris (64bit), AIX and HP released
- » RE: 10gR2 for solaris (64bit), AIX and HP released
- » RE: 10gR2 for solaris (64bit), AIX and HP released
- » RE: 10gR2 for solaris (64bit), AIX and HP released
- » Re: 10gR2 for solaris (64bit), AIX and HP released
- » Re: 10gR2 for solaris (64bit), AIX and HP released
- » Re: 10gR2 for solaris (64bit), AIX and HP released
- » Re: 10gR2 for solaris (64bit), AIX and HP released
- » RE: 10gR2 for solaris (64bit), AIX and HP released
- » RE: 10gR2 for solaris (64bit), AIX and HP released
- » RE: 10gR2 for solaris (64bit), AIX and HP released
- » Re: 10gR2 for solaris (64bit), AIX and HP released
- » Re: 10gR2 for solaris (64bit), AIX and HP released
- » Re: 10gR2 for solaris (64bit), AIX and HP released
- » RE: 10gR2 for solaris (64bit), AIX and HP released