RE: 10g easier to administer than MS SQL
- From: "Jesse, Rich" <Rich.Jesse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 09:18:37 -0500
I don't know. Any paper that says to monitor a system, "Set threshold =
for Buffer Cache Hit (%)", I'll treat as suspect.
:)
Rich
Rich Jesse System/Database Administrator
rich.jesse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx QuadTech, Sussex, WI USA
> -----Original Message-----
> From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 7:48 AM
> Subject: 10g easier to administer than MS SQL
>=20
>=20
> The following article summarizes an independent study of=20
> administrative
> effort between 10g and SQL Server:
>
> The study itself can be found at:
> <http://www.progstrat.com/research/gems/040401rdbmscmcs.pdf>.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Other related posts:
