RE: 10.2 locations for Admin and Oradata directories
- From: "Gogala, Mladen" <MGogala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'ssatterthwaite@xxxxxxxxxxx'" <ssatterthwaite@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Oracle-L <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 18:02:43 -0400
Sarah, it isn't just under Winduhs, the $ORACLE_BASE/admin was moved under
$ORACLE_HOME. If you come to think of that, it makes sense. Database is
always managed by certain version of software and you can have several
versions under the very same $ORACLE_BASE. Databases that are 10.2 will be
under 10.2 software tree, those managed by 9.2 will be under 9.2 software
tree, databases running 5.1.22 and 6.0.36 will be under
$ORACLE_BASE/Smithsonian software tree.
--
Mladen Gogala
Ext. 121
-----Original Message-----
From: Sarah Satterthwaite [mailto:ssatterthwaite@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 3:15 PM
To: Oracle-L
Subject: 10.2 locations for Admin and Oradata directories
Oracle 10.2 on Windows
I am playing with this and did a default install of the sample database. I
was very surprised to find the admin and oradata trees under
ORACLE\PRODUCT\10.2.0. Is there any reason why it is desirable to keep then
in a version specific tree? Many versions ago they did things that way but
then they got smarter and made the Admin and Oradata areas version
independent.
I know I can do a customized setup and change this, but I am wondering if
there is any good reasons to do it the way they did in their sample
database.
Thanks,
Sarah
____________________________________________
Sarah Satterthwaite
Database Administrator
Fiserv CSW
FAX: (617) 498-0959
sarah@xxxxxxxxxxx
Fiserv Lending Solutions
125 CambridgePark Drive
Cambridge, MA 02140
www.valuserv.com
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
