Re: 10.2 listener won't start on same port as 9.2 listener
- From: Richard Ji <richard.c.ji@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: DGoulet@xxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 13:34:01 -0400
It's backward compatible but not without problems some times. I ran into
a problem using 9i listener for a 8.1.7.4 <http://8.1.7.4> DB where it start
to run out of file
descriptors. Revert back to 8i listener solved the problem. So I had to
run two listeners.
Regards
Richard
On 9/21/05, Goulet, Dick <DGoulet@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The advice I got from OTS some years ago, like with the release of 8.0,
> was to use one listener for all databases on a single server, just use the
> latest listener installed as they were backwards compatible. That advice has
> been working extremely well ever since. So my question would be why do you
> want a separate listener, unless you've got two or more IP addresses, and
> consequently NIC's, for one server?
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
> oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Gogala, Mladen
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 21, 2005 11:20 AM
> *To:* 'JayMiller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'; oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* RE: 10.2 listener won't start on same port as 9.2 listener
>
> Oracle is, quite obviously, listening to my advice, even if some listers
> are not.
>
> --
>
> Mladen Gogala
>
> Ext. 121
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* JayMiller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:JayMiller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 20, 2005 6:07 PM
> *To:* oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* RE: 10.2 listener won't start on same port as 9.2 listener
>
> Well, I just got the answer from Oracle and apparently 10.2 is purposely
> not allowing you to do this any more. It was done as a fix for another bug
> and this behavior will be backported to earlier versions in future releases.
>
> Looks like we're going to have to go with a single listener, like it or
> not.
>
> Sigh.
>
>
Other related posts:
