I feel the need to point out here, since this seems to be missed so often on this site, that the issue here is not a lack of interest in the programming of FOTA TV networks. Nor is it unwillingness to pay the subscription fee that may result from the retrans concent agreement. On the contrary, MVPD subscribers are up in arms that they might lose this programming, and that's what the lawmakers are responding to. People wants the FOTA channels, and they are willing to pay for them in order to get drop-dead easy reception, I have to conclude. So be it. Perhaps the MVPDs should think in terms of not carrying the FOTA signals, but sending out "antennisti" to erect appropriate antennas for their interested customers. In the long run, I think OTA may be better for it. Not to mention that the FCC would have to think twice before yanking away any of the spectrum. Bert --------------------------------- http://www.tvtechnology.com/article/104104 Retransmission Letters Fly on Capitol Hill 07.28.2010. WASHINGTON Retransmission is becoming a popular topic of correspondence on Capitol Hill. Lawmakers are circulating letters among colleagues and firing them off to the FCC. They are asking the agency to open an inquiry into the rules governing satellite and cable carriage ob broadcast signals. Rep. Carolyn B. Maloney, (D-N.Y.) joined her colleagues Reps. Steve Israel (D-N.Y.) and Peter King, (R-N.Y.) in circulating a letter in the House calling for retrans reform. Maloney also implored FCC chief Julius Genachowski to do likewise in a July 24 letter. "I am writing on behalf of the millions of New Yorkers who have been and may be negatively affected by retransmission consent disputes between local broadcast stations and multichannel video programming distributors," she wrote. "Specifically, cable operators and broadcasters in New York are engaged in complex negotiations to renew existing retransmission consent agreements, some of which are scheduled to expire this summer." Said pending expiration is between Time Warner Cable and Disney. The retransmission contract between the two ends Sept. 2. "If these agreements are not renewed, important programming for many New Yorkers could be dramatically affected. It is not fair to punish consumers for the failure of these companies to reach an agreement, which is why I urge you to take whatever steps are necessary to protect consumers, including my constituents, from losing any programming as a result of these negotiations," Maloney wrote to Genachowski. "Finally, I also encourage the commission to move as quickly as possible to update its retransmission consent rules to ensure that consumers will be protected during future renewal negotiations." The "Dear Colleague" letter from King and Hill went out as the New York City Council considered a resolution to ask Congress to intervene in retrans. Broadcasters in New York and Washington implored the New York contingent to leave well enough alone. ( See "New York Retrans Fight Goes to D.C.") The King-Hill missive is reported to have signatures of just 13 of the House's 435 members, according to The Hill. Reps. Gene Green (D-Texas) and Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) also circulated a "Dear Colleague" letter urging restraint, according to John Eggerton at Multichannel News. A handful of legislators weighed in on the FCC docket related to a retrans petition from several multichannel video providers. Rep. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.) wrote to Genchowski July 19 asking simply for a review, rather than reform. "To be clear, we are not choosing sides in this matter nor are we advocating a specific resolution," he said. The FCC has thus far given no indication it will overhaul retransmission consent rules. -- Deborah D. McAdams ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.