Craig Birkmaier wrote: > And why would cable feel constrained to limit their > ability to compete because some consumers will be > using cable-ready tuners integrated into new DTV > receivers? I think the whole line of reasoning is ridiculous. Everyone is "constrained" by interoperability standards, no matter what they are. At first, these standards support smooth deployment of the service. Thereafter, they constrain improvement. It doesn't mean improvement is impossible. It's simply not as easy as when you started out. DTT broadcasters TODAY have to rely on STBs for the transition. People won't go en masse and buy DTT sets the day before analog shutoff. This reliance on transitional STBs would apply to cable or DTT whenever there's a change in the standard. The DBS companies are just as "constrained," in the sense that deploying a zillion new STBs is not free for them either, or for their customers. Sure, consumers who are finally rid of the burdensome STB won't relish the thought of having to use one again, in the interim. So what do you suggest? Annoy consumers continuously, so they won't object when a transition occurs? This was also true for the introduction of UHF TV. So this analysis simply didn't broaden its perspective enough to see the whole landscape. Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.