Yup. It is why film has a grainy appearance when shot at low light levels or blown up too much. Regards Craig > On Aug 20, 2014, at 6:25 PM, Cliff Benham <flyback1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Remember, the distribution of grains of silver on a photographic film are > *RANDOM* > while those on an electronic sensor are *NOT*. > > This distinction makes quite a difference in image quality. > > Cliff > >> On 8/18/2014 9:30 AM, Craig Birkmaier wrote: >> Well said Bert. >> >> Regards >> Craig >> >>> On Aug 17, 2014, at 9:13 PM, "Manfredi, Albert E" >>> <albert.e.manfredi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Cliff Benham wrote: >>> >>>> Here is a quote from someone in Hollywood writing on the TIG website. >>>> >>>> "Commercially available HD images are all of 14 years old. When HD >>>> is 100 years old like film is, considering how far things have come >>>> in just 14 years, I expect that its capabilities will *far* surpass >>>> what the very last of the neg could do. >>>> >>>> They just need to move away from single sensor Bayer filtered crap >>>> where colors are made up out of math. And yes, I said Bayer >>>> filtered crap." >>> >>> But, Cliff. In color film, colors are *also* made up out of math. The only >>> significant difference is that film grain doesn't consist of a >>> deterministic pattern or pixels, as digital sensors have. >>> >>>> And remember: Digital will never be as good as Analog because >>>> digital always throws away part of the image. Always. >>> >>> As does analog. The problem is the same. You need to constrain channel >>> bandwidth, for practical implementations. In analog, your tools are simpler >>> and more crude, that's all. So you do things like limit the high frequency >>> content more, limit the color saturation more, limit the frame rate more >>> (e.g. with interlacing tricks), and that sort of thing. Resulting in that >>> soft, unsaturated image that we were led to believe was the best TV could >>> do. >>> >>> Digital only affords more sophisticated techniques. For example, with >>> digital, not having to transmit over and over again a part of the scene >>> that has not changed conserves bandwidth requirements. That bandwidth can >>> instead be put to use in transmitting sharper edges than the analog system. >>> And/or, more intense colors. And/or, a whole lot of extra program material. >>> >>> Bert >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: >>> >>> - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at >>> FreeLists.org >>> >>> - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word >>> unsubscribe in the subject line. >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: >> >> - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at >> FreeLists.org >> >> - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word >> unsubscribe in the subject line. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: > > - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at > FreeLists.org > - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word > unsubscribe in the subject line. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.