By way of interlineations > -----Original Message----- > From: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > On Behalf Of Tony Neece > Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 4:20 AM > To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [opendtv] Re: White paper from CEA > > Very true, Craig. There are books on programming PSIP that are as big = > as a > dictionary. With the squeeze on reducing staff at TV stations it is = > very > doubtful that they will have anyone on staff that really is allowed to = > spend > the time to deal with this. After spending almost 6 years alone in a room writing PSIP generation and t&m systems, I beg to differ. I don't know of more than one PSIP book that is as big as a dictionary, but I will note that in Mark Eyer's PSIP book (he's the godfather of PSIP) the print is substantially bigger than a dictionary, and there is plenty of blank space between the lines of text. Art Allison's "Understanding PSIP" is much smaller, but the print is still big. Frankly, nobody at a TV station needs to understand much about PSIP these days. The toughest issue is getting the psip generator to read the station's particular automation (or log) file format, and to get the advance information to the unit, and to update the data set when there's any change in plans. The PMCP protocol (ATSC A/76) automates the exchange of information, making station tasks easier. There is also fresh work going on with the ATSC T3/S1 subcommittee (which includes me as a member) to become more powerful. Few vendors of PSIP generators or automation systems have fully embraced PMCP. When they do, many problems will become legacy issues. I can say that there will be a fully PMCP compliant PSIP generator and PSIP test and measurement system shown at ** The Tech Retreat **, provided I can see my way to attend. At least one station group has specified that all their future PSIP products need to be PMCP compliant. PMCP is a bitch to deal with, but only as a system developer. One of the largest broadcast equipment firms is unhappy with the current state of PMCP compliance in products from the existing vendors. So, this situation is not as bad as you paint it, and it will get better in the next round of equipment upgrades. > Also often the DBS or Cable companies cover = > the > stations EPG with their own. DBS systems have superior EPGs. The issue is the accuracy of the information. I believe you are exaggerating about cable companies covering up station EPGs with their own, since this plainly IS A CRIME and the stations can even sue over it. The FCC rules say that cable systems have to pass on all "program-related information" for the terrestrial program stream(s) that they carry. Indeed, several crimes would be involved, since by covering up Event Information Tables, they would be denying viewers parental ratings and captioning information that stations are legally required to transmit as of 1/1/2005. Cable systems have less engineering and programming staff than most TV stations, it's a non-starter that they would hand-code ratings and captioning information. I believe you meant to say that many cable systems offer their own EPGs, which tend to favor cable-only programming. >It is a mess. Digital technology provides = > so > many lovely features, but the drawback is it also adds a whole lot of > complexity. Huh? It's harder to setup a digital camera over an analog one? Sure is a whole lot easier to use a Windows XP computer than a Windows 1.2 one. Sure, XP is more complex, but only us programmers care about that. Just keeping the audio delay correct is a big headache for > example. As more and more viewers get their TV from digital sources = > this is > going to piss off a lot of them. =20 > This is usually a cinch. You balance the video encoder throughput delay against the AC-3 encoder delay. If you care to do it. > We all should be very diligent in calling or writing to the offenders to = > let > them know the public is watching digital and is being annoyed.=20 > Particularly if your cable system strips out or covers up PSIP. > The front office was told by vendors at the NAB years ago: "No Worries = > Mate" > this spiffy "state-of-the-art" "new age" digital gear will always take = > care > of itself! > > I suspect few GMs even watch much of their own station. Too busy with > social obligations that go with the position. > Have you ever met a GM? Engineers watch the station, and are responsible for the content. The social obligations of GMs center around advertisers, station reps, showing the flag at charity and community events and tending to time buyers. If a GM isn't happy with what a station shows, budgets, programs or personnel are changed. John Willkie > Tony > > > -----Original Message----- > From: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] = > On > Behalf Of Craig Birkmaier > Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2005 6:25 AM > To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [opendtv] Re: White paper from CEA > > > And then there is PSIP. A PVR is largely useless without an EPG, and=20 > many stations are not doing PSIP properly, even today. > > Regards > Craig > =20 > =20 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: > > - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at > FreeLists.org=20 > > - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word > unsubscribe in the subject line. > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: > > - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at > FreeLists.org > > - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word > unsubscribe in the subject line. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.