John, dipole gain comes in because UHF receiving antennas can compensate in large measure for the more rapid attenuation of UHF signals. I think I'm disagreeing that indoor reception of VHF is necessarily easier than indoor reception of VHF, which is why I was wondering why you tried to discount the fact that a receiver was available even in 2001 which could get solid indoor reception of 8-VSB from 17 miles away. Let's do the numbers on your numbers, just so this can be clear. I'm using 50 mile range, a required 25 dB margin, and free space attenuation for this comparison. Your Channel 23, 525 MHz, 1.23 MW transitter's signal is attenuated 125 dB at 50 miles. Assuming a 25 dB margin, a receiver with unity gain antenna will see -59 dBm of signal. Not bad. Your Channel 6, 83 MHz, 100 KW transmitter's signal is attenuated 109 dB at 50 miles. Assuming a 25 dB margin, a receiver with unity gain antenna will see -54 dBm of signal. Now, how hard is it for a UHF antenna to make up that 5 dB signal difference? Not very. UHF antennas can afford to be higher gain, because the elements are much closer together! I think that was Doug's point. Bert > -----Original Message----- > From: John Shutt [mailto:shuttj@xxxxxxxxx] > > Doug, > > You lost me completely. You mean we've been wasting all that > money on power bills for our UHF 23? > > WLNS Channel 6 here in Lansing runs at 100 kW ERP and covers > an area of > 31,907 sq. km. We, WKAR Channel 23, run at 1,230 kW ERP and > cover an area of 16,624 sq. km. > > Where does UHF dipole gain come in? > > John > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Doug McDonald" <dtvmcdonald@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Not really. VHF uses lower powers because > > a tuned dipole antenna has a receiving area > > inversely proportional to the square of the frequency. > > > > However, at UHF it is far easier to get gain; a UHF > > antenna as big as a channel 2 dipole will have a truly > > gigantic gain and will pick up the same actual > > fraction of the ERP as will the Ch. 2 dipole. > > > > Also, UHF signals penetrate modern houses with > > foil heat barriers in the walls much better than > > VHF, especially low VHF, because there are several > > waves in the size of the average window at UHF, only > > one at high VHF, and less that one on Ch. 2. > > > > > VHF is much less line of sight. > > > > This is true. Digital Ch. 3 needs far more power than > > it is getting. > > > > Doug McDonald ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.