[opendtv] Re: Twang's Tuesday Tribune (Mark's Monday Memo)

  • From: "John Willkie" <jmwillkie@xxxxxxx>
  • To: <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 4 May 2004 12:50:53 -0700

So, you might be correct, but only in the future?

John Willkie

-----Original Message-----
From: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Craig Birkmaier
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 11:58 AM
To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [opendtv] Re: Twang's Tuesday Tribune (Mark's Monday Memo)


At 10:22 AM -0700 5/4/04, Kon Wilms wrote:
>  >I can understand how this could happen because of poor control of
>addresses by a manufacturer. What I cannot understand is how two
>devices located anywhere in the world can share the same MAC address.
>
>Actually it is quite easy. Of the 6 bytes in a mac address, the first 3
>represent the manufacturer id. The manufacturer must randomize the last 3
>for device rollout. With a range of 3 bytes, there is bound to be
>duplication (you can't even roll out a decent amount of receivers without
>using up every number). Many manufacturers cut corners in manufacturing and
>use a random number generator but do not check against a known list of ids
>previously created.
>
>Plus, you can change the MAC address on most boards (datacast receivers are
>notorious for allowing you to do this).
>
>So its not so useful for targeting or ensuring data only reaches one
recipient.

Thanks!

Doesn't IPV6 deal with these shortcomings?

Regards
Craig


 
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:

- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at 
FreeLists.org 

- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word 
unsubscribe in the subject line.

Other related posts: