If they aren't re-encoding to lower the bit rate then I'm not sure why an MPEG-2 ATSC to MPEG-2 QAM conversion should have to cost any quality at all. Can anyone explain if this is true, and why?
- Tom Albert Manfredi wrote:
In the current edition of The Perfect Vision, page 66 in the online version, is an article that explains what we should expect for 18 Feb 2009. You have to go to www.theperfectvision.com and it will direct you where you need to be. It says that for cable customers, your cable company might have to replace your STB if it hasn't already done so. I suppose the wording is vague enough that one might consider it true. No mention, though, that cable companies are free to continue broadcasting analog TV as long as they please. But the most interesting thing, on Page 69, is that OTA HDTV transmissions are expected to be higher quality than cable HDTV. The reason being, cable has to go through a conversion process from "ATSC format" to "QAM format" used by cable, so presumably you lose in that conversion process. Interesting. It says so in black and white. Bert _________________________________________________________________ Climb to the top of the charts! Play Star Shuffle: the word scramble challenge with star power.http://club.live.com/star_shuffle.aspx?icid=starshuffle_wlmailtextlink_oct ----------------------------------------------------------------------You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
-- Tom Barry trbarry@xxxxxxxxxxx ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.