>> 1. The 2006 date was not at all a joke, back in 1997 when it >> was set, and it could easily have been met. It would simply >> have required Congress and the FCC to do two years ago what >> they have done now. Mark Aitken wrote: > IF (BIG IF) it had worked "out of the box", it could > have easily happened. Absolutely. I agree. That's why I said "two years ago" and not, say eight years ago. I think the FCC could have mandated 100 percent built-in receivers to start on 1 March of 2004, giving the LGs and Linx companies some 6 months more than the date when they had their fully integrated solutions ready for production in large quantities. That would have allowed for an analog shutoff date of 1/1/2007 quite easily. The first lab demos of 4th gen receivers occurred in the first quarter of 2002, with promises of an integrated solution a year later. The integrated chips were tested in the first quarter of 2003. By the fourth quarter of 2003, volume production was feasible (or so we were told). Add a 6 month margin, and the 100 percent rule could have been set for, say, March or April 2004, vs March of 2007. Allowing a shutoff date of 1/1/2007 as easily as a shutoff date of 1/1/2010 can be met now. I think we've been p*ssing away all sorts of time with indecision. And unfortunately, not necessarily time well spent at all, because no one moves ahead when they see indecision. Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.