I suspect it's not much different in the way that Britain separates terrestrial DTV transmitters from content and the way they restrict what Sky/BSB can do with content. If I'm not mistaken, that's not done in the U.S., and since broadcast transmitters are a "voice" under the relevant court cases interpreting the first amendment, not much likely to be followed here on an involuntary basis. There seem to be two basic models of broadcasting in the world. The system in the United States, Mexico and many other countries has private broadcasting dominate. The Euro-centric model has -- until the last decades -- only public or governmental systems dominant. (Italy, starting in the late 1970's, due to a court ruling, started to break that model.) Then, there are the "mixed" systems that combine a bit from each model. Canada and Japan are examples of that, where there are large private channels, but the government owned systems are large if not dominant players. John Willkie -----Original Message----- From: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of John A. Limpert Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 8:54 PM To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [opendtv] Re: The Wired Utility Concept ... How do the Europeans manage their DAB multiplex transmission systems? That's a separation of content from broadcasting. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.