Tom Barry wrote: > It sure seems to me the world should find something useful > to do with (low) VHF that does not require home indoor > antennas. Though maybe it's suited for the wide open > prairies or something. Yes. They like low VHF in places like Alaska. > How about if it was used to send from VHF big sticks to > low power UHF repeaters with tall outdoor receiving > antennas? Would that work? I think it would work just fine wherever you can easily wrestle a large antenna. Antenna size aside, I think it was Doug Lung who hit the nail on the head on this one. He explained in one of his articles that the FCC had simply not taken into account the noise level in low VHF. It's not enough to just say that the received signal has to be at least -85 dBm at the receiver's antenna input. It *also* has to have a C/N ratio >= 15.2 dB, or so. So, when they tried to cut the margin too close on the V/m signal density aspect of the problem, as they did with all of the VHF allocations, they apparently totally blew the C/N criterion in these noisy channels. Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.