Using those figures, I get similar results: 38.55 inch line width, or a 44 inch diagonal measure 16:9 screen, and a 48 inch or so 4:3 screen. Of course, I haven't accounted for having more than one dot of each color per pixel, nor the actual pixel configuration. The issue, then, is how many sets have such closely spaced phosphors, and how many sets have monospaced pixels. Neither appears to be universal. John Willkie -----Original Message----- From: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of John Golitsis Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 12:24 PM To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [opendtv] Re: The Math on Screen sizes Fine. So then what math are you using to calculate your massive screen widths? My math would be: .51mm x 1920 = 979.2mm or about 98cm, or about 38.5 inches. Since we're being precise here, those measurements aren't exactly correct because it would clip exactly one 'dot' (half a dot each side). To be honest, I've lost where this thread is/was going. None of this stuff has anything to do with 4:3 versus 16:9. ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Willkie" <johnwillkie@xxxxxxxxxx> > Horizontal or vertical spacing of imaging elements. Like homes being framed > with 2 x 4's being spaced at 16 inches on center. The pitch -- the spacing > between the same point on the members -- is 16 inches. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.