It may or may not have been on this list but yesterday I read some article about what the convergence of TV and computer increasingly looks like. The answer was it basically looks like a computer. They have all the problems you mention but more and more people are getting used to them. Many on this list probably know I have used nothing else for about 8-9 years now. Add a wireless keyboard and, in my case, a track ball sitting next to my chair and it pretty much takes over all media entertainment functions while also allowing big screen web browsing and email from a recliner. Most of the time I don't even touch the keyboard. Though the use of a computer for entertainment media is hindered by the fact it can be used to get around most copy protection functions by the determined. While that is a feature for the users it is a nightmare for media distributors. But it is happening anyway. - Tom Kilroy Hughes wrote: > That's pretty sweet. I'm surprised more companies don't package HTPC systems > like this with low noise, remote control, tuners, disc player, and home > theater A/V connectors ready to go. Maybe they will now there are so many > digital entertainment sources to manage. > > I've been enjoying a similar system I put together about a year ago (except > only ATSC tuners, not CableCard). I'd recommend upgrading to a couple 1TB > drives in a RAID 0 array instead of 500GB, mostly because it's cheap; not > because I have a problem storing tens of thousands of digital photos and > music albums, a few dozen HD TV shows, and millions of tiny e-mails like this > one. > > My biggest problem was getting a reliable ATSC signal because I'm near city > center on a flat lake with line of sight to the transmitters (:-) go figure. > I went through several tuners and antennas until I found a combination that > could handle the multipath for most of the stations with a single antenna > position and gain ("5th gen" tuner cards beat out the built in DTV tuners I > tried). I still record dropouts and blocking every couple minutes when the > rain gets bad ... about 160 days a year in Seattle. I never watch live > broadcast, so I'm not around to beat and swear at the antenna when it's > happening and just have to delete shows when they are too messed up. > > However, "reception" is quite reliable on Hulu, Fancast, etc. over my modest > 1.5 Mbps DSL phone line; and there's always You Tube links in emails and > video downloads to watch. Call me a Luddite, but I refuse to tweet. > > The graphics card is important, and it looks like Sony's is good enough. I > use a 55" 120Hz flat panel for primary display, and usually connect with > 1920x1080P60 HDMI for general purpose video and desktop use. I also use a > separate dedicated HD disc player in another input that connects at > 1920x1080P24 so the display can "refresh" at 120Hz without 3:2 pulldown > judder or luma requantization. Sometimes I'll downshift the PC to 24P or 30i > so the display will use or extract 24 frames buried in a broadcast signal or > DVD image file for 42ms/frame display duration (sometimes I turn on frame > interpolation for 120Hz, mostly not), but I usually don't bother because I > use the 24P disc player for serious DVD and HD disc viewing. > > Most ATSC broadcast content is so ugly with MPEG-2 compression artifacts and > other defects at this level of "magnification" that it is worse than adaptive > internet streams and DVD with lower MTF. DVD usually looks better than ATSC, > and HD DVD/BD dramatically better when each is fully optimized. Staged HD > shows like local news and Leno, and 60P sports look very good on ATSC, better > than DVD; but the majority of airtime is bothersome bad on this kind of > system. It's hard to watch a great show like "Planet Earth" falling apart > because it's bit starved or badly encoded; as opposed to the transparent and > immersive disc experience. Web pages, Flash animations, text, PowerPoints, > magazines, digital photos, etc. look perfect from across the room, and > broadcast suffers by comparison. I don't have cable or satellite to compare > to now, but they used to look worse than ATSC, except for my 8VSB reception > problems. > > I use a single Harmony remote control for entertainment, and keyboard or > mouse for surfing or working. (The remote sets all the inputs, turns on/off > the appropriate boxes, etc. I just say "make it so" with buttons for "Watch > recorded TV", "listen to radio", "play music", "surf the net", "watch DVD", > etc.; and the buttons on the remote setup the system (not trivial) and take > on the appropriate functions/codes.) > > These systems CAN be very consumer friendly by consolidating TV, streaming > video like Hulu and NetFlix, Web, radio, "CD audio" (ripped), music services > like iTunes, DVD and BD disc, video games, photos, VOIP phone, IM, email, > news, RSS feeds, video editing, disc burning, EPG/PVR, etc. into a single > user interface and remote control(s). But, they can be impossible for the > average consumer if not well integrated by someone like Sony, and spared > amateur modifications like P2P programs, Trojans, random antivirus and > indexing programs, etc. that will bring the system to its knees, crashing > along the way. > > Kilroy Hughes > > -----Original Message----- > From: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On > Behalf Of Manfredi, Albert E > Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 16:26 > To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [opendtv] Sony Vaio home theater PC > > Just had a chance to play with this little, round, home theater PC STB > device. It is just the sort of PC I had in mind, to bring the Internet > to the (H)DTV and audio system. > > RF remote keyboard with standard mouse pad. Built in BluRay > player/recorder. Built in PVR functionality, using its hard drive. > Regular old Internet access. Windows Vista installed. Also a normal > looking remote control, for the non-Internet related functions. > > http://www.sonystyle.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?catalo > gId=10551&storeId=10151&langId=-1&productId=8198552921665296592 > > This was in a store, and Saturday afternoon, which had a way of giving > me a realistic demo. Which is to say, there may not have been any RF > reception issues per se, since this setup wasn't even using WiFi (it has > 802.11b/g built in), but that didn't mean "good reception" anyway. With > all the kids in the store playing with laptops and stuff, the poor guy > couldn't even manage to stream 400 Kb/s. Not even close. Never managed > more than a couple of seconds of streaming video. > > Obviously, the congestion problem here was between the store's internal > network and its Internet link. However, seems to me the problem would > also occur in most ISP nets in the near term, if the majority of users > start watching TV over the Internet. > > Still, I did manage to see what the low rate IP media streams look like > on a ~50" LCD HDTV. Not bad. And of course, there are sites that allow > download of much higher quality stuff. They want about $1700. It's also > very quiet. This is the sort of STB that will probably become the norm, > in short order. > > Bert > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: > > - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at > FreeLists.org > > - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word > unsubscribe in the subject line. > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: > > - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at > FreeLists.org > > - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word > unsubscribe in the subject line. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.