[opendtv] Some hard questions for Sinclair
- From: "Brian Park" <floman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:26:32 -0500
From http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/102104B.shtml
Normally I'd just post the link, but this pretty well asks the hard
questions. How will Sinclair respond? Last post by me on the Sinclair
crusade for truth.
bp
Letter: New York Comptroller Questions Sinclair
Alan G. Hevesi
Comptroller
110 State Street
Albany, New York 12234
State of New York
Office of the State Comptroller
October 18, 2003
Mr. David D. Smith, CEO
Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc.
10706 Beaver Dam Road
Hunt Valley, MD 21030
Dear Mr. Smith:
As New York State Comptroller, I am the sole trustee of the $115 billion
New York State Common Retirement Fund. We hold 256,600 shares of Sinclair
Broadcast Group Inc. As a shareholder, I am writing to ask about some recent
actions that have brought a great deal of publicity to our company. I would
like to understand how these actions will improve performance and add to
shareholder value.
It has been reported publicly, and confirmed by representatives of
Sinclair, that you have ordered all of our 62 television stations to reserve
an hour of prime time sometime later this week to show a film titled "Stolen
Honor: Wounds that Never Heal" and that this film will be shown with no
commercial interruption.
It is my understanding that this film deals with issues related to the
Vietnam War and Sen. John Kerry's actions during and after that war. The
film is very controversial and, according to press reports, has been called
by some "an anti-Kerry attack masquerading as a documentary."
Please understand that because of our size and our investing
perspective, we are not short-term traders, but rather long-term investors
eager to work with management that seeks to build long-term value in our
companies.
I would appreciate it if you would provide answers to the following
questions as soon as possible:
1.. What is the cost to our company of foregoing an hour's worth of
commercial time for all 62 stations? Critics say showing the film amounts to
an in-kind contribution to President Bush worth millions of dollars.
2.. Is there any offsetting benefit to our company from the loss if this
income?
3.. Will the film be shown with no commercial interruption because
advertisers were not willing to buy commercial time during its presentation?
4.. There are press reports that some advertisers are boycotting
Sinclair in response to the decision to run this film. How many advertisers
have pulled their ads and how much will this cost our company?
5.. What has been the impact of this controversy on overall ratings for
our 62 stations? Since the cost of advertising is directly related to
ratings, what has been the financial impact of that change in ratings?
6.. It is important to television stations to attract as large as
possible an audience. It would seem that even appearing to take sides in a
hotly contested presidential election would provide a substantial risk of
alienating some significant portion of the potential audience. Has this
controversy affected our stations ability to attract a broad audience?
7.. One of the largest shareholders, Barry Lucas of Gabelli & Co., which
owns about four percent of Sinclair, has been quoted as follows: "I don't
want my media companies that cover the news to be making news." Given the
stocks' already poor performance, it would seem that any bad news would risk
reducing investor interest and, thus, risk a lower stock price. What has
been the impact of this controversy on the views toward the company of Wall
Street analysts and other key investors? Are investors, especially large
investors, selling out of Sinclair stock?
8.. What was the role of our company's board of directors in the
decision to show this film?
9.. In its 2004 Proxy Statement, the company acknowledges its
"relatively small number of independent directors on the Board." In fact,
only three current directors appear to meet the independent criteria
established by Nasdaq. As a result, the board can draw on only these three
directors to serve on Audit and Compensation Committees and to perform the
Nominating Committee function (although the board has also named one
non-independent director to serve on two committees). Does the board believe
that these three independent directors alone possess the requisite skills
and can make the time commitments needed to effectively perform the
important functions of these committees? Do you have any plans to increase
the number of independent directors?
10.. Our company has not produced good returns. Sinclair's shared have
lost about half their value in 2004. The price per share of Sinclair's stock
has declined from $15.03 on January 2, 2004 to $6.94 as of today. During the
same time period Sinclair's performance has plummeted by 53.9%, while other
stocks in its sector (the Russell 2000 Consumer Discretionary sector)
increased by 2.4%, and the Russell 2000, on the whole, increased by 1.8%.
What are your plans for improving returns for shareholders?
11.. Our company has two types of shares with unequal value. It is our
experience that this arrangement entrenches management and may harm
performance. We trust that you are also strong believers in capitalism and
competition. Please explain how this concentration of power benefits
shareholders who own the majority of the shares, but have a minority of the
voting power. Please discuss how this arrangement has affected our company's
performance.
12.. Some critics suggest that Sinclair management is more interested in
advancing its partisan political views than in protecting shareholder value.
They say Sinclair's partisan agenda also risks alienating viewers,
advertisers, and regulators. Could you explain why they are wrong?
13.. By appearing to tie future prospects of the company so closely to
the outcome of a national election, are you adding political risk to the
normal economic and business risks that face our company? What is the
benefit of taking on this additional risk?
14.. Please discuss any plans to rebroadcast this film after the initial
prime time broadcast. What would be the cost of those additional showings?
15.. According to press reports, some organizations "are vowing to find
groups in cities with Sinclair stations who will challenge the broadcast
licenses of every Sinclair-owned station over the next several years. Such
challenges almost never result in lost licenses, but they often result in
heavy legal costs for the station having to defend them." What would the
impact of such legal actions be on our bottom line? If even one such suit
were successful, what would be the cost to our company?
Please respond to these questions as soon as possible. If you have
questions or would like to discuss these issues, please contact our director
of corporate governance Julie Gresham at 212-681-4480.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
Alan G. Hevesi
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
Other related posts:
