Craig Birkmaier wrote: > At a minimum, Nat is correct. I'm very glad to hear you say that, since it is what both Dale and I have been suggesting for (literally) years. > But Bert still has it wrong. IT is not necessary to have a forest > of transmitters to cover a market with SFNs. The AVSB NAB demo > was restrained for obvious cost and complexity reasons. As Media > Flo demonstrates, it can be done with a small number of medium > powered sticks. As I mentioned already, the MediaFLO network covers only Wash DC, Balt, Phila, and NYC, and a ribbon of highway between them. Many areas now covered by big sticks are disenfranchised, and I already listed a few (one was the MD Eastern Shore). In short, it takes 30 medium powered sticks, meaning multiple 10s of KW ERP per stick, so no small fry, to cover a smaller overall area than is now covered by OTA broadcaster towers with 4 big sticks (DC, Balt, Phila, NYC). Now, I will grant you that ease of reception should be a factor in making that comparison. However, you won't find the dense and wide area SFN any easier to receive a long distance away than the big sticks. More the opposite, thanks to the mutual interference. Maybe in certain locations inside the SFN, reception will be easier than it would be from big sticks. But the better the receivers are, the LESS they need an SFN for ease of reception. And OCRs would also help matters, without having to count on very large numbers of them to cover the market area. Also, it bears repeating that cell networks work as well as they do for two main reasons: they are not SFNs, and each client conducts a negotation with each cell tower to obtain a connection. Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.