[opendtv] Re: Qualcomm on Channel 55

  • From: "John Willkie" <JohnWillkie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 11:08:17 -0700

funny that you also didn't read bert's posting of the relevant text to the
list yesterday.

John Willkie
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bob Miller" <bob@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 9:44 PM
Subject: [opendtv] Re: Qualcomm on Channel 55


> Now I used the plural, technologies, I don't remember doing so, might
> have, my computer doesn't remember either. Could you point out where I
> used this dastardly indictable "plural". If I did I apologize for the
> grievous error since I did not mean to suggest that MPEG2 transport was
> ancient, just the codec.
>
> Bob Miller
>
> John Willkie wrote:
>
> >no, you spoke of MPEG-4 technologies supplanting MPEG-2 technologies.
Note
> >the plural.  You've conceded video is one technology.  Could you
describle
> >the other technology in MPEG-2 that will be supplanted by MPEG-4 in the
ATSC
> >universe, heck even in the DVB universe.
> >
> >John Willkie
> >----- Original Message ----- 
> >From: "Bob Miller" <bob@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >To: <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 6:24 PM
> >Subject: [opendtv] Re: Qualcomm on Channel 55
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>I have never spoken of MPEG4 transport streams.
> >>
> >>Bob Miller
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>John Willkie wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>I do not believe you have any authority to assert what is understood
> >>>commonly or otherwise.
> >>>
> >>>When one speaks of MPEG-4 transport streams, as you did, one is a fool.
> >>>
> >>>John Willkie
> >>>----- Original Message ----- 
> >>>From: "Bob Miller" <bob@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>To: <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 12:05 PM
> >>>Subject: [opendtv] Re: Qualcomm on Channel 55
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>I think John knew that. It is understood that MPEG2 commonly refers to
> >>>>the compression codec. When someone speaks of the MPEG2 transport
stream
> >>>>they say MPEG2 transport stream.
> >>>>
> >>>>Bob Miller
> >>>>
> >>>>John Shutt wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>Alright John, enough.  I think you've beaten Bob over the head long
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>enough
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>for what you know perfectly well was a slip of the tongue.  When he
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >said
> >
> >
> >>>>>MPEG-2 Transport Streams were obsolete, you know he meant MPEG-2
video
> >>>>>compression.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Sheesh.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>John
> >>>>>
> >>>>>----- Original Message ----- 
> >>>>>From: "John Willkie" <JohnWillkie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>It was not I who said that MPEG-2 transport streams were passe, nor
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >was
> >
> >
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>it
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>I
> >>>>>>who thought that there were MPEG-4 transport streams.  I deal with
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>MPEG-4
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>all the time.  In MPEG-2 transport streams.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
>
> - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
>
> - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
>

 
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:

- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at 
FreeLists.org 

- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word 
unsubscribe in the subject line.

Other related posts: