Kon Wilms wrote: I had written: > >In fact, you need use no IP overhead at all. The > >broadcast TV traffic can use MPEG-2 TS without IP > >overhead, and the two-way traffic can use normal > >circuits as defined in CDMA. Or IP overhead can be > >added to the data circuits of the CDMA 2-way > >unicast service. And/or IP overhead can be added > >to the MPEG-2 TS in the broadcast service. This > >is all very interesting, but let's not over-hype. Correct me if I'm wrong, but since FLO is ip unicast and multicast overlay for data delivery, you'd be stuffing that MPEG2 TS in UDP packets. That sounds like.. a really bad idea. I agree that would be ugly. No, more like the other way around. What do they use for a link layer? How do they synchronize their frames? They must have something under IP. If it's not MPEG-2 TS, it's something else. Point being, there's nothing earth shattering about making everything IP-encapsulated. By itself, that's not such a big deal. What's important is that every frame be recognizable and that the system support the types of data flows they want to provide. By itself, IP encapsulation doesn't explain how this is done. For some flows, IP encapsulation is not much more than unnecessary overhead. Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.