Jeezus. The city of San Diego has more people than the entire country of New Zealand. Heck, one of the other cities within the County of San Diego has almost as many people as the entire country of New Zealand. And, the San Diego TV market (San Diego County and Tijuana) has about 10x the population as there are kiwis. (As long as we don't count the sheep.) And, since NZ has no other country to coordinate with, they have plenty of rf to play with. You are comparing a peanut to a watermelon. Wag the dog. John Willkie -----Mensaje original----- De: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] En nombre de Craig Birkmaier Enviado el: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 10:43 AM Para: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Asunto: [opendtv] Re: People DO watch LPTV At 11:08 AM -0400 4/1/08, Manfredi, Albert E wrote: >You're such a broken record, Craig. Ditto's Bert! > >Did you pay attention to the New Zealand DTT standard? No? Maybe you >should. Why? What is the relevance for our market. They have a standard that can reach nearly everyone in New Zealand, and thanks to their patience, they are able to leapfrog most of the early deploying countries with H.264. And if Mobile becomes an issue for them - and it will - all they need to do is use a different constellation that will work with all receivers. > >Just like here, they standadize on HDTV. Which means, every receiver >must be compatible with HD signal streams, which avoids the need to >simulcast. You sure are hung up on this simulcast issue. It's kinda funny, considering the reality that simulcasting is a way of life here in the U.S. We have and will continue to have analog cable, and for MANY markets, the DBS operators will continue to offer SD, not HD locals, at least until they have the capacity to do HD. That a DTV receiver should be able to deal with multiple formats is not the issue. Any new system can and will do this. And those countries that launched early with SDTV will have the advantage of deploying not only h.264 but other improvement that will support SFNs and mobility. > >Funny, no one is complaining about that. But you sure did complain about >that when the ATSC did this, over a dozen years ago. I did? Perhaps what you are viewing as complaints was really just my opinion that we could have deployed a scalable system that would support various levels of receiver complexity? > >They use 64-QAM, 3/4 FEC, 1/16 GI. As close as you can get to 8-VSB >spectral efficiency, and not particularly good for SFNs. Is anyone >moaning about that? Nope. >Once AGAIN you keep trying to set the bar for spectral efficiency in >terms of bits per Hz. The real measure of spectral efficicency is >the level of service(s) that can be deployed. We got the worst of >both worlds here: 1. Poor spectral reuse, which limits the channels available in most markets. particularly those in close proximity to other markets. 2. A MAJOR penalty to ADD support for Mobility and portable use which will make your bits per Hz measure of efficiency look rather pathetic. >Oh, and indoor reception works fine with 8-VSB, and has done so since >the 5th gen receivers came out. That was 2003. Pardon my french, but BULL! This is entirely dependent on signal strength, receiver location and building structure. Sorry Bert, but you need to read the note with the asterisk *actualy milage may vary... >The difference is, when >indoor reception is not perfectly reliable in COFDM countries, people >put up an outdoor antenna and move on. Like Jeroen did, for instance. >Over here, you have to hear all manner of moaning and whining. If the person can put up an antenna, or even desires to do so. And we still get many reports of locations where even this is problematic. The reality is quite simple and obvious. With analog, indoor reception may have been less than perfect, but a set with rabbit ears was expected to provide some level of service. With VSB rabbit ears have disappeared from the Consumer Electronics landscape. And once again, each country is different. Broadcasters here care only about the quality of signal they deliver to cable and DBS, and the checks they get in return. Regards Craig ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.