Craig Birkmaier wrote: > But wavelets have had a difficult time historically > competing in the Interframe compression arena, > because of the need to introduce some kind of block > based coding to handle the interframe predictions. It would indeed be interesting to see comparisons of compression efficiencies. However, I don't think a wavelet-based MPEG algorithm would use block base coding at all. MPEG now uses blocks, because that's what the DCT or integer transform produce. So if you start out with blocks at the I frames, you use a block-based approach for the B and P frames. If instead your I frames are based on frequency windows, you create the predictions or interpolations based on frequency windows, not blocks. You simply adjust the strategy based on the structure of the I frame. For example, perhaps the low frequency images show less variability than the higher frequency images, and can more easily be predicted or interpolated, or in any event don't need to be transmitted as often as the higher frequency components of the frame. So an efficient moving image algorithm which uses the DWT as its basis can be created. One which does not simply repeat the entire DWT every single time. Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.