--- "Manfredi, Albert E" <albert.e.manfredi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Dan wrote: > > > If ESPN were offered to broadcasters, then the > amount > > of money that cable/DBS paid would go down, > perhaps > > drastically. It's hard to charge a princely sum > for > > something and give it away at the same time. > > Not really, and the reason is, spectrum. That's the > great equalizer. OTA > will not be able to compete with volume of > offerings. Americans like > volume. I don't follow. Don't you think that if ESPN were available for free, cable operators would be unwilling to pay the same $3/month that they are currently paying? It would still be worth something (many broadcasters receive payments from cable), but surely not as much. If ESPN figures that they would lose more subscription income than they would gain from an OTA outlet, then they won't do it. > > So, the cable programmers who are currently > feasting > > on subscriber revenue are not likely to gamble on > OTA. > > I thought ESPN belonged to Disney? No? I agree with > you that if the > content is created by a cable-only producer, of > course it wouldn't be > offered OTA. As long as the content is created by a > conglom with OTA > presence, which they mostly have, then it should be > a matter of fair > competition. In principle it shouldn't make any difference. The content provider doesn't need to own the infrastructure. That's true for both cable and OTA. Dan ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.