[opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- From: Bill Sheppard <Bill.Sheppard@xxxxxxx>
- To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 15:04:58 -0700
Manfredi, Albert E wrote:
>An STB with the combination digital cable and ATSC is
>close to useless. Because cable systems provide their
>own STBs for this purpose.
>
>However, if built into integrated sets or recording
>devices, the combination makes infinitely more sense.
>It is what makes incorporation of ATSC front end into
>TV sets (and recording devices) palatable for anyone
>buying new equipment.
>
I believe what's being missed in this whole discussion is that within a
year after completion of the Two-way Plug-and-Play agreement we can
reasonably expect that most sets will be fully-OCAP compliant, thus
creating for the first time a critical mass of consumers able to receive
standardized application content on their television. This will open up
a world of additional services delivered through the television and
create a whole new DTV ecosystem...
Bill
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Sheppard Industry Marketing Manager, Digital TV
bill.sheppard@xxxxxxx Software Systems Group
(408) 404-1254 (x68154) Sun Microsystems, Inc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
Other related posts:
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400