[opendtv] Re: News: The Real Fight Over Fake News

  • From: "John Shutt" <shuttj@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 14:50:22 -0400

Moments after I sent my diatribe, this shows up in my inbox.

Dale said in very few words what I tried to say in a book. Says a lot about Dale, and even more about me!

John

----- Original Message ----- From: "Dale Kelly" <dalekelly@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 2:06 PM
Subject: [opendtv] Re: News: The Real Fight Over Fake News



Craig wrote:
While clear QAM support may exist in many new receivers, what is
it good for?
Apparently you can see some broadcast re-transmissions, but
presumably you could get them with an antenna.

You're correct that it is of little or no value to the ~15% or so viewers
who depend exclusively on OTA.

However, there are many more basic cable customers who are delivered OTA DTV stations in the clear and who can view them at no additional charge (without
the expensive upgrade to digital cable) using a QAM enabled receiver.
IMHO that is one of the things it is "good for".

There are also many homes that simply can not receive OTA signals and who
don't have an OTA option ......

Dale


-----Original Message-----
From: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Craig Birkmaier
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 6:53 AM
To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [opendtv] Re: News: The Real Fight Over Fake News


At 9:46 PM -0400 6/5/08, Tom Barry wrote:
>Sorry, I can't quote any numbers or hard facts, only my own opinion
>picked up from hanging out on AVS and from shopping for a low end
>LCD when my projector bulb popped a few months ago.
>
>But I can say that, at the low end, both Target's Olevia and
>Walmart's Vizio newer models all seem to support clear QAM.  I ended
>up with a Vizio and can say it has no problems with it on Cox.  And
>I think Vizio is now something like the 2nd best selling LCD brand
>now.
>
>Until the sparsity of 'hard facts' is corrected I'm going to stick
>with my previous opinion that clear QAM support will become an
>expected option in most sets going forward.  And I also think
>true2way has some momentum building.
>
>- Tom

While clear QAM support may exist in many new receivers, what is
it good for?

Apparently you can see some broadcast re-transmissions, but
presumably you could get them with an antenna. It is my understanding
that virtually all digital cable content is encrypted...

Is this what most people are finding?

Regards
Craig


----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:

- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration
settings at FreeLists.org

- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the
word unsubscribe in the subject line.





----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:

- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org

- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.







----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:

- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word 
unsubscribe in the subject line.

Other related posts: