On Mon, 2005-01-03 at 21:24 -0500, Tom Barry wrote: > But most of that is software, with no marginal cost to reproduce once > you've made it. I already allowed for that in my first comment and I'm > not so sure there is much additional security needed over that of a > regular STB. But I suppose the broadcast flag robustness tax may add a > little. You are making the assumption that the h/w platform has a header and support for the had drive, that the chassis airflow design can handle the additional component, and that the PSU can handle the additional powerload of the added component. And I haven't even hit issues like the fact that you will have to tool a new faceplate if you want to show hard drive activity, or that you may need extra onboard flash and ram to handle buffering to/from disk and storage of additional PVR-only data. On the software side, its 'just software' if you have things like a MMU, multithreaded/tasking OS, etc. Most STBs do not. So you come down to margins. There is little sense in offering a dumbed down version that people can later upgrade to a full PVR, since you have to sell at the lowest price point (you have to compete with pricing of standalone-STBs as your 'user' may not want PVR capability). It is more logical (from a design and business standpoint) to create two product lines instead. Cheers Kon ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.