Craig Birkmaier wrote: > > I think the premise that the digital tuner is > > meant primarily for HDTV is what's wrong. Digital > > is the next general purpose TV standard, which > > includes, but is not exclusively for, HDTV. > > Agreed. But you get both when you get a digital tuner. Not necessarily. You might get HDTV on larger sets, but you might not on small and cheaper portables. This is exactly the same situation as you get with portable radios as opposed to fancy home hifi stereo systems. I don't think anyone today assumes that a radio with an FM band is necessarily an audiophile quality sound system, right? The point I'm trying to make is that *if* it were true that the ATSC front end will add "hundreds" of dollars to the price tag of a cheap TV set, *then* the CE manufacturers would obviously have been hard at work developing decimating receivers. While I don't know for sure that they aren't developing such cheap decimating receivers, my suspicion is that the economics won't make sense. Common front ends, built in highly integrated packages, are already emerging that will put an end to this "hundreds" of dollars stuff. Before Christmas, I saw a brand new Samsung ATSC STB for $199. Surely, built into a cheap TV, the guts of this STB will not add up to "hundreds" of extra dollars. Yet, it did provide HD outputs. > My concern is that people will find them inadequate > for HDTV, and thus be reluctant to invest in a > mandated HDTV tuner. What's mandated is a DTT tuner, not HDTV. As the price of the front end erodes in the next couple of years, consumers will forget all about it. The hardware is not the price problem. Perhaps the royalties are. Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.