Craig Birkmaier wrote: > Just look at the capital investment in the cable plants over the > past decade. Yes it was labor intensive. But that investment was > made and the infrastructure is in place. No, actually. Some of it might be, but the EPONs first installed had to be upgraded to GPONs, and in the next few years they will be upgrading to 10GPONs. (Look it up.) Cable systems that use HFC will have to move their fiber closer to homes. All of these systems work basically the same way, where the bandwidth is aggregated passively as you move upstream. Which means, when high sustained rates are demanded now, that aggregated capacity has to be increased. This requires people with shovels and backhoes. > As for the load factors, that just a network design issue based on > statistics. As I said before, you simply sub-divide the branches > as the load goes up. Which requires shovels and backhoes. Some are calling for FTTH to become the norm, but that's hardly the whole story. To be more futureproof, you'd need not just FTTH, but no PONs. You'd need every home connected in a star topology to central offices, via single mode fiber. At least that way, speed increases could be accomplished with equipment upgrades in the COs, perhaps new modems in homes that requewst higher speeds (user-installed), and upgraded backhaul networks. But of course, that takes even more initial investment. Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.