Craig Birkmaier posted: http://www.baltimoresun.com/entertainment/bal-te.to.localtv03apr03,0,374 8488.story It seems to me that there are two different topics here: 1. The way OTA TV should be evolving, and 2. What local TV broadcasters should be creating. It is no surprise at all to me that OTA TV, *and* terrestrial radio, should be evolving something that isn't as heavily into "local TV" or "local radio." After all, the vast majority of what people want from their cable or DBS channels, or satellite radio, has nothing at all to do with "local." So, 85 percent of US households evidently don't view "localism" as being so very important. My question has long been, and continues to be, why should the survival of the OTA network be handicapped with this "localism" emphasis, when it seems abundantly clear that the reason people flock to MVPDs is exactly the opposite of "localism"? It's good for the station CEOs to be investigating alternative ideas for what sort of content they create and how they distribute it. And at the same time, it seems that terrestrial distribution networks should also be allowed to evolve too, and one example would be the increase, or abolition of, the national cap. Keep the local caps, abolish the national cap. Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.