Targeted advertising is going to be very important? I used to think that. I can say that exactly NOBODY in the broadcast or cable space that I've talked to has ever expressed the slightest interest in Directed Channel Change, the working technology that enables this functionality today. There are serious infrastructure problems; putting the spots into a traffic system, playing them out, and the belief that the only way to deliver the content in a live stream is to pre-encode the spots. (No good for live.) Then, there's the client side. For this to work, you need to have DCC support in receiving devices and each device needs to enable MPEG-2 stream splicing, or the spot inserts will be glitchy. Then, imagine how Nielsen will measure the delivery of such spots, and the need for the receiving device to know the location of the user. I wish it weren't so -- I've spent much time enabling my PSIP generation systems to generate DCC. Due to market conditions, I've decided making it an extra-cost option. Come to think of it, I was in the office of a high-ranking network engineering executive a few years back when he took a phone call. To close out his call, he said something to his caller about "and when we implement Directed Channel Change everything will change." This particular network, I was told yesterday, uses a traffic system that was written in Clipper in the mid-1990s, runs in DOS in 640k of memory on a Novell 5 network. The new FCC rules on PSIP (which go into effect on May 29 of this year) will ultimately lead to adding PMCP support to that system, or replacing the whole system, as the FCC will be requiring PSIP listings to match up with the actual programs, including sports over-runs. John Willkie -----Mensaje original----- De: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] En nombre de Craig Birkmaier Enviado el: Thursday, February 28, 2008 9:33 AM Para: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Asunto: [opendtv] Re: News: DIGITAL TV OPENS UP TWO-WAY OPPORTUNITIES At 8:11 AM -0800 2/28/08, Kon Wilms wrote: > >My condolences. There's a reason it was never adopted by any data >broadcasters... it was a joke. In general I agree. I dropped out of the process because it was going nowhere - too much emphasis on the DSMC -data carousel technology developed in Europe as a replacement for teletext. > >> Given the fact that TV broadcasters are living in a time warp, they >> just might be ready for something like this now... > >Doubt it. The entire article is nothing more than free Triveni >marketing. All the 'angles' and 'advantages' have been long since >eclipsed by broadband. I agree that times have changed, and anything that broadcasters try to do in the "wireless" space will compete with broadband and new competitors in the 700 MHz spectrum (maybe even competitors in the "white spaces." But broadcasters COULD leverage existing back channels and get into the game using Web technologies. > >Targeted advertising? Chuckle. Targeted advertising is going to be VERY important. But it will probably need a back channel to close the loop with the audience. Regards Craig ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.