Craig Birkmaier wrote: > The real issue here is how much longer can broadcasters survive > if they hold onto the notion that all receivers are disconnected > and dumb and that any innovation must be endorsed by all. There are two discussions here: feeding information back to the broadcasters from each viewer, and developing standards for receivers which must interoperate compatibly with all broadcasters. To feed back info to the broadcasters requires the separate two-way link. End of story. And for the CE industry to develop receivers that all broadcasters can benefit from, as opposed to designing specialty STBs for each broadcaster, would require the sort of collaboration among broadcasters that we have not often witnessed. > You are stuck with the notion that every receiver must be the same > and that broadcasters will not attempt to deliver a service to a > subset of the audience. Obviously they are already doing this via > viewing demographics. So, you really think that each of the local broadcasters will be developing their own STBs. Great idea. And you really expect people to buy 6, 7, or more STBs to be able to benefit from these new services. Brilliant. Any other flashes of genius? As to how many services can be multicast over the same 20 Mb/s broadcast channel, fewer words and more simple arithmetic are in order. Just add up the bit rates. Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.