Ron Economos wrote: >I'm not really trying to defend 1394. Just pointing out >that Kilroy's alternatives don't exist in the cable STB >world (at least not yet). From what you said earlier, they exist in hardware, but anti-competitive industries are keeping these features disabled. No doubt the same motivation that keeps CableCard from being more successful than it is. If it weren't for the tuner mandate/plug and play agreement, we'd have even less interoperability. >My current thought is that the critical mass for home >networks (using any transport) is quite far in the future, >if ever. Even DLNA (which everyone seems to like) >would seem to have a difficult road ahead. But I may >be wrong I agree on your reasoning about excessive level of geek-only appeal. Also, if the multichannel system subscribers are those most likely to want home nets, which seems logical, they will be butting heads against precisely those industries that are most intent on preventing such open interoperability. I don't see how Firewire can possibly be the solution, or any other individual protocol. This has nothing to do with protocols. It also has nothing to do with Microsoft, as far as I can tell. It's the same old story. Bert _________________________________________________________________ Don?t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.