Craig Birkmaier wrote: > Now this makes sense, as compared to what CBS did with their $5.99/mo > streaming service. That's funny. I saw the same story about NBC, but I didn't post it. Why not? Because it's basically no news. It's just more of the same-o same-o TVE concept, therefore of limited interest. Whereas the CBS and HBO stories are more forward-looking. > More support for TV Everywhere, and soon support for all of those > "crippled" streaming boxes that Bert detests. More proof that these > boxes are not crippled by the manufacturers, but rather, by the > content conglom lawyers. Only "more proof" that Craig believes Internet access should not be neutral. Once again, Craig, the congloms already make their content available using well known and long established IP standards. If device makers prefer to develop ecosystems that balkanize the Internet, then forcing themselves to have to make special deals with these content owners, and if further the pundits prefer to obfuscate the readership, by implying that such balkanized ecosystems are the only way to move forward, I wouldn't call that progress. It would be better to hear more voices such as that one WSJ article, to educate, rather than dumb down, the readership. Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.