Craig Birkmaier wrote: > I seem to remember some industry tests of COFDM versus 8-VSB, > which were followed by FCC tests. If the NAB statement above > were applied to these tests, the shoe would be on the other > foot. to paraphrase the statement above: > > "With the immense importance of the testing to innumerable > stakeholders, one would think that broadcasters would > certainly ensure the good working order of the prototype > device(s)used for the COFDM/8VSB tests." > > Instead these tests were meaningless, due to the use of COFDM > "receivers" without the proper filtering on the front ends. > One might even go so far as to suggest that these tests were > purposely rigged. I have a completely different view of these test results. In both cases, the outcome should have been obvious. It should have been obvious that 8-VSB *could be made* to work just fine, and it is just as obvious that using white spaces will definitely be problematic. You don't need clueless politicians getting yanked around by self-serving marketers to decide on such straightforward technical facts. What's wrong with simple truth? That's what I don't understand. Why isn't it clear when self-serving parties are voicing their self-serving agendas? Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.