[opendtv] Re: Let the games begin
- From: "Bob Miller" <robmxa@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 09:37:41 -0500
On 11/14/06, Tom Barry <trbarry@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yes, I agree, for the 8vsb transition we should "stay the course" and
show one way or the other in 2009 exactly how well the current ATSC
standard can work. We are down to only a couple years now, so let's
just do it.
Then, in 2010, we can re-evaluate and grade how well we have done
compared with the rest of the world. If Bert is correct then by that
time we should have compatible ATSC converters for $50 that work fine
with rabbit ears. Hopefully we will also have VCR/PVR's that allow us
the expected functionality with OTA. The market will either provide or
ATSC will get voted off the island and we can then do something else.
Practically anything is preferable to further delay.
- Tom
Anything is preferable to further delay. The delay is the modulation.
Yes anything is preferable to further delay. Lets get rid of the
modulation.
i.e. We need DOCR's. If you accept that and you accept that legacy
receivers DELAY for an INDEFINITE time any use of DOCRs then you
accept that 8-VSB as limited by legacy receivers is responsible for
the DELAY.
Or do you suggest that we go ahead and build DOCRs that trash legacy
receiver reception? If so the legacy receiver holy cow situation goes
away and we should consider switching to a new modulation and codec.
Or do we wait to build these necessary DOCRs till we find a way of
making them work with legacy receivers? That sounds like DELAY.
Possibly an infinite one.
If you believe as I do that manufacturers, retailers and therefore
consumers are not very interested in participating in the OTA
transition because of reception problems with 8-VSB then the
modulation is the DELAY. If you don't accept that fact then you have
to explain in convoluted twisted logic why LG sells COFDM receivers in
OZ with 19 million people but can't make money selling 8-VSB receivers
in the US a market of 300 million people. even with the advantage of
owning IP royalty rights for 8-VSB.
Bob Miller
Bob Miller
Bob Miller wrote:
> My point, Doug Lung's point was that legacy receivers are a problem
> when designing DOCRs. Even if 5th gen receivers work perfect with
> DOCRs the legacy receivers hold back their use.
>
> Until you can design a DOCRs that will work with legacy receivers you
> can't use DOCRs based on the legacy receiver is holy theory.
>
> But you need DOCRs for a successful DTV HDTV transition according to Doug.
>
> Catchy 22.
>
> Legacy receivers are bad. But you can't get rid of them and they are
> increasing in numbers everyday. What to do what to do.
>
> I guess we are just stuck with a dead OTA. But above all we must stay
> the course.
>
> Bob Miller
>
> On 11/13/06, Albert Manfredi <bert22306@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Bob Miller wrote:
>>
>> >One other little problem with legacy receivers and the
>> >future/present needs of the US DTV spectum.
>> >
>> >Doug Lung in "China's new DTV Standard and DOCRs" brings
>> >up the troubling need for DOCRs. He thinks they are required
>> >for a successful OTA HDTV future.
>>
>> For the record, I didn't buy your other arguments, but we've been over
>> them
>> time and time again.
>>
>> What you need for digital OCRs is a reasonable amount of pre-echo
>> tolerance,
>> where the amount of pre-echo tolerance you have is proportional to how
>> much
>> power the OCR can transmit, compared with the power density in that
>> location
>> generated by the main transmitter. This is the same consideration you
>> have
>> to give to SFNs that use unsynchronized transmitter.
>>
>> The safe way to design this sort of network is to use what the French
>> call
>> the umbrella configuration. The big stick is used for the bulk of
>> coverage
>> (e.g. the Eiffel Tower), and the OCRs are low powered enough that they do
>> not interfere with each other and don't radiate so far that the main
>> transmitter will create what looks like strong pre-echo many usec
>> prior to
>> the repeated signal.
>>
>> The 5th gen receivers can stand strong pre-echo out to roughly 15 usec or
>> so, realistically, which means that beyond 3 miles from the OCR, you
>> really
>> want that repeated signal to become weak compared with the main
>> transmitter's signal. That's so the main transmitter will again seem like
>> the dominant signal, and the OCR will create a benign post-echo. As the
>> relative power of the pre-echo drops, 5th gen receivers can tolerate
>> quite a
>> bit of pre-echo. Like -50 usec.
>>
>> The CRC demoed these in Ottawa, using the LG 5th gen demod. They got good
>> results with two OCRs creating coverage that overlapped with the main
>> transmitter, which is not half bad.
>>
>> Yes, this is a strong suit of COFDM -- pre-echo tolerance -- although 1st
>> and 2nd generation DVB-T receivers (according to the French CSA document
>>
>> http://www.csa.fr/pdf/Rapport-GT2-Aspects_Radiofrequence_de_la_TNT.pdf
>>
>> Section 2.3.1.5) also had trouble with pre-echo tolerance.
>>
>> It is of course not unreasonable to expect that as time goes by, as
>> things
>> change, people will require STBs even if they own an integrated set.
>> We have
>> discussed this many times too. If AVC is introduced, for example. I think
>> OCRs or gap fillers can be used with 8-VSB, and would be easiest to
>> implement when terrain masks the main transmitter's signal. Like in a
>> valley. Using directional antennas with the OCR helps too. No matter
>> 8-VSB
>> or COFDM, designing a solid multi-transmitter single channel network
>> in no
>> trivial task.
>>
>> Bert
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Try the next generation of search with Windows Live Search today!
>>
http://imagine-windowslive.com/minisites/searchlaunch/?locale=en-us&source=hmtagline
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
>>
>> - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
>> FreeLists.org
>>
>> - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
>> unsubscribe in the subject line.
>>
>>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
>
> - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
> FreeLists.org
> - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
> unsubscribe in the subject line.
>
>
--
Tom Barry trbarry@xxxxxxxxxxx
Find my resume and video filters at www.trbarry.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
Other related posts:
