[opendtv] Re: I have installed DVB-T

  • From: Jeroen Stessen <jeroen.stessen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 12:45:57 +0200

Hello, 

Jeroen: 
>> I haven't measured, but the whole city is only like
>> 10x10 km2 and the tower is within the city limits. So my
>> guess is 6 km.

Bert: 
> So this provides a good point of comparison. I'm assuming 600 MHz
> channels here (UHF).

UHF 21 = 470-478 MHz until UHF 66 = 830-838 MHz . YMMV. 

> The 10 KW transmitter, approximately 6 Km as the crow flies, is
> problematic for indoor reception downstairs, but is solid with an
> outdoor antenna. 

It's not the indoor/outdoor difference, it's a telescope half 
dipole versus a Yagi with (I forgot to count) ~12 elements. 

Here at work, on the south-west end of the town, we receive DVB-T 
from the same transmitter that is somewhere between south-east and 
the center. We are on the 8th floor (9th for the Americans), but 
this indoor antenna is on the wrong side of the building. It would 
have a perfect view of the planned Eindhoven 1 transmitter, but the 
active Eindhoven 2 is blocked by the building. Reception is lousy, 
even though the indoor antenna is amplified. And as far as this 
antenna is directional (it looks like a dish, but that could be 
just plastic) it seems to be directed the wrong way (south-west). 
It's just not worth updating the installation until September, 
when the 2nd transmitter right in front of our window becomes 
operational. That might be only 1-2 km away, i.e. just perfect. 

> Even if I just use free space propagation loss, which of course
> is not valid at such long terrestrial distances, a 550 KW transmitter
> 46.6 miles away creates a received signal that is 4.53 dB weaker than
> the 10 KW station at 6 Km.

I have that kind of reserve with the (unamplified) Yagi. 

> The other point is that Eindhoven seems to be a good case for a
> two-tower SFN, which should even be doable using 8K mode with a GI of
> 1/16. This should allow about 9 Km tower spacing safely.

This is a part of the planning, for channel 33 and the entire country: 

City           Coord N Coord E Province    Chan  Freq ERP(kW) Height(m) 
Pol. Operational/Planned 
Smilde        52N54'14 6E24'15 Drenthe       33 566-574  30  295  V  O 
Nijmegen      51N51'25 5E49'44 Gelderland    33 566-574  15  103  V  O 
Groningen     53N12'01 6E36'58 Groningen     33 566-574  20  128  V  O 
Hertogenbosch 51N42'53 5E16'32 Noord-Brabant 33 566-574  10  102  V  P 
Breda         51N36'14 4E45'47 Noord-Brabant 33 566-574  20  127  V  O 
Eindhoven 2   51N26'56 5E31'55 Noord-Brabant 33 566-574   5   87  V  O 
Eindhoven 1   51N25'16 5E25'56 Noord-Brabant 33 566-574  15   94  V  P 
Oss           51N45'17 5E33'27 Noord-Brabant 33 566-574  10  105  V  O 

As you can see, I receive this channel from only a 5 kW transmitter 
that is operational. The 15 kW mast comes on line some time between 
now and September. That should improve the situation a lot. 
And all the transmitters in Brabant plus the one in Nijmegen seem 
to be forming a Single Frequency Network, that much is obvious. 

Regards, 
-- Jeroen

+------------------------------------------+------------------------------------+
| From:    Jeroen H. Stessen               | Phone:  ++31.40.27.40246  |
| Deptmt.: Philips Applied Technologies    | Mobex:  ++31.40.27.99650  |
|          Digital Systems & Technologies  | Mobile: ++31.6.4468.0021  |
| Address: High Tech Campus 5 - room 5.025 | Skype:  Jeroen.Stessen      |
|          5656 AE Eindhoven  - Nederland  | VoIP: 
Jeroen.Stessen.at.Philips  |
| Website: http://www.apptech.philips.com/ | E-mail: 
Jeroen.Stessen@xxxxxxxxxxx |
+------------------------------------------+------------------------------------+

Other related posts: