"'The reason people are paying such a high premium for these ads on the Internet is they do have a captive audience,' David Poltrack, CBS' chief research officer, told Bloomberg. 'You know you have eyes on the screen.'" Perhaps so, but that is MOSTLY because online you only watch one 30-second ad per ad break, and you're busy waiting for that "continue" button to appear. If OTA also delivered only one 30-second ad per ad break, you could bet a lot of money that you'd have a more captive audience there as well. What's the difference? There's hardly enough time to do any channel surfing in 30 seconds. Whether or not the online show gives advertizers all sorts of information about the viewer of the ad, I frankly don't know. I would be surprised if information transmitted about viewers, without their explicit consent, is not blocked now, and even more so in the future. The argument that makes most sense to me is that the online ads are worth more, simply because they are not each diffused by a zillion other ads in that same ad break. People would very quickly lose interest in online viewing if they had to submit themselves to 4 minutes of ads at each ad break, and these were not even fast-forwardable. So I doubt that ad revenues per TV episode are all that different between online and broadcast TV. Bert ----------------------------------------- http://paidcontent.org/article/419-hulu-tv.com-getting-higher-ad-rates-t han-their-network-counterparts/ Hulu, TV.com Getting Higher Ad Rates Than Their Network Counterparts Tameka Kee Jun 25, 2009 2:33 PM ET Share Networks like A&E, Scripps, and possibly even CBS are ready to test whether the much-hyped TV Everywhere concept will serve as a lucrative business model for online video, but there is news that premium video sites like Hulu and TV.com are finally starting to deliver ad rates that are greater than what the networks would get for their shows on air. Running an ad during The Simpsons on Hulu, for example, costs about $60/CPM, Bloomberg reports; running the same ad during prime-time on TV costs about $20-$40/CPM-or over 60 percent less in some cases. For some sites, garnering these higher CPMs is nothing new-and to be clear, the quality of the content (and the site) determines whether they get the higher rates. But the fact that prime-time staples like The Simpsons and CSI are getting better CPMs online than on air is worth looking into. Content providers (and advertisers themselves) have long justified sky-high rates for prime-time TV ads, on the basis that such ads deliver unparalleled reach and branding power. TV ads still beat online video ads in terms of reach-just over 7.5 million unique viewers live streamed CBS' NCAA championship game, for example, compared to the 17.6 million that tuned in on-air-but what about user engagement? That's where the shift in perception-at least from an advertiser standpoint-seems to be taking place. "The reason people are paying such a high premium for these ads on the Internet is they do have a captive audience," David Poltrack, CBS' chief research officer, told Bloomberg. "You know you have eyes on the screen." Sites like TV.com and Hulu also tend to show fewer commercials per episode, which reduces ad clutter, but caps the amount of revenue they're able to generate. So, plagued with less inventory (and smaller audiences), content providers are still struggling with the overall shift in viewership from TV to the web-since even with the higher CPMs, the revenue they generate from online content isn't enough to replace what they've traditionally brought in from TV. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.