Craig Birkmaier wrote: "Turning a TV into a web browser is not going to solve the problem. We have already seen how the first generation of Google TV crashed and burned because they relied on crude third party GIU solutions to the TV interface." Bert wrote: "On this point, I think you missed it completely. Google lost because they tried to become an exclusive portal for TV content, and the TV networks told them to go pound sand. And why shouldn't they?" Craig, are you talking about the General User Interface (GUI) for GoogleTV? I admit that it is clunky on most devices, but I don't think that is why GoogleTV failed. I think it is the fact that the media was blocked to that basically killed GoogleTV's main function. I'm not sure how Google TV tried to become an exclusive portal, but I do know that the fact that one cannot stream media from regular websites that are normally available to personal computers takes away the most important feature of the GoogleTV. Google responded with trying to provide their own programming through things like Revue but that is not the programming that was promised by the GoogleTV in the first place. Personally, I find the blockage of programming to the GoogleTV appliance as an afront to an open internet. I am not sure why a device should make the difference between whether I can see the programming or not. If it is available on the internet, it should be available. So if they don't want to deliver it because I am using a particular device, I simply won't watch it; I'll basically boycott it. I believe anyone that wants to erect a wall builds their own prison. Dan