I have been working on a project that requires transforming our interlaced video into MPEG-2 files. I know I'm stating the obvious, but compressed interlaced media looks much worse than progressive pictures in the MPEG-2 format no matter what encoding program I use. And de-interlacing the video makes it much worse. When all the planning went into the ATSC formats, was the way the formats would be compressed and the resulting quality ever considered? With the way display technology and compression processing is developing, is it possible to get rid of interlaced media in the near future, or are there other functions to consider? I suppose the only way to get rid of the interlaced media these days is produce in 720p. Is it reasonable to produce in 1080 30p (if you aren't doing sports)? I don't see enough production technology yet to produce completely in 1080 60p. In the mean time, is there any way to deal with interlaced video in the ATSC and MPEG world? By the way, whatever the free Windows Media Encoder does to de-interlace the video, it works much better than the dozens of other encoder software I've tried that cost $60 to $2000. Perhaps the AVC helps. Dan Grimes