Bob Miller wrote: > To me the quote says that EVEN if using MPEG-4 the trade > off between SD and HD is STILL "three or four standard > definition channels". > > They don't say anywhere what the trade off would be if > they used MPEG-2. A little creative intepretation, I see? The simple fact is, however, that BBC SDTV continues to be H.262. So what they are saying here is they need more spectrum for HDTV. The H.264 applies ONLY to HDTV, as of now, in the UK, with the possible exception of this future Sky by-subscription DTT tier. I wonder why there's so much resistance to this notion. After all, we knew all along that one of the biggest improvements allowed by H.264 was to move the I frames further apart, and we knew all along what that probably meant for practical implementations. Right? It should not be such a big surprise that the savings would not be as much as theoretically possible. Not only that, but it should be a relief for broadcasters. They can charge ahead without having to think they are so heavily compromised. The spin doctors might be disappointed, but those who depend on this stuff for a living should instead breathe easier. No excuse to sit still. Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.