Craig Birkmaier wrote: > On the downside, a 4:3 display and a 16:9 display with the same > picture height would carry the same value... I decided to bite the bullet and just talk in diagonals awhile back=20 since that seems to be what is most used. But also because increasingly = the sets, if not the content, will be 16:9 where the diagonal is almost=20 exactly 2 screen heights anyway (2.04) and thus easy to convert in my hea= d. - Tom > Hmmmm... >=20 > In a world where TV displays now come in a variety of sizes and=20 > aspect ratios, what is the best way to provide a consistent and=20 > meaningful measurement to guide consumer purchases? >=20 > Screen diagonals have been the standard used by manufacturers and=20 > retailers, despite the fact that the FTC requires screen width as the=20 > standard in their rules. >=20 > But screen height may be the best measure today, given the reality=20 > that a widescreen display will be used to view content that is=20 > 1.33:1, 1.66:1, 1.78:1, and a variety of wider aspect ratios in=20 > letterbox. And a vertical measurement is useful in determining the=20 > correct viewing distance, which is typically given is screen heights. >=20 > On the downside, a 4:3 display and a 16:9 display with the same=20 > picture height would carry the same value... >=20 > What's the best measure? >=20 > Regards > Craig >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA623039.html?display=3DBreaki= ng+News&referral=3DSUPP >=20 > FTC's Lost Rule: Screen Measurement >=20 > By Staff -- Broadcasting & Cable, 7/3/2005 11:43:00 PM >=20 >=20 > Here's an outlaw gang that doesn't exactly strike fear in hearts of=20 > peaceable citizens: Sony, RCA, Best Buy, Circuit City =8A and just=20 > about any other TV manufacturer or retailer that has done business in=20 > the U.S. in the past four decades. The misbehavior recently came to=20 > light only after the Federal Trade Commission, during a routine=20 > every-10-years review of its guidelines, looked into what is known as=20 > the "picture tube rule." >=20 >=20 > The rule, which has been on the books since 1966, dictates how TV=20 > sets are advertised, and requires that the size of sets listed in=20 > ads, store displays and packaging be based on the screen's horizontal=20 > measurement. The FTC's intent was to ensure consumers had consistent=20 > specifications for comparing models. And they do-but the problem is=20 > that, for as long as anyone in the business can remember, sets have=20 > been consistently sold according to their diagonal measurement. >=20 > So a 36-inch spec represents the distance between a lower corner and=20 > the upper corner on the opposite side. It also represents a more=20 > impressive-sounding sales tool: The horizontal measure on a=20 > standard-sized TV would be 28.8 inches. >=20 > The matter "is not something we've paid a whole lot of attention to,"=20 > says Julie Kearney, regulatory counsel for the Consumer Electronics=20 > Association. >=20 > The CEA is asking the FTC to rewrite the rule and require diagonal=20 > measurements instead. > The association helpfully noted that both the FCC and the U.S. Trade=20 > Representative rely on diagonal measurements in rules governing=20 > technical specs and imports of television sets. > =20 > =20 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: >=20 > - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at = FreeLists.org=20 >=20 > - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word = unsubscribe in the subject line. >=20 >=20 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.