Craig Birkmaier wrote: > What was (is) needed is to demand that the cable systems publish > the requirements to develop products that will work with their > systems and allow any thrd party product to be attached to their > networks. Ironically, this IS happening with cable modems thanks > to the published DOCIS standards. The common approach to any of these industrial standards is that the industries themselves participate actively in their development, but then the government, usually, or some other entity with clout, has to enforce the standard. The FCC isn't expected to actually DEVELOP these standards, just as they did not DEVELOP ATSC. They're involved in the process, and then they mandate, after the final decision has been made. If you leave this up to the industries entirely, the results are what we have seen. And may see more of in the future. DOCSIS, which by the way could just as easily have been built over a cable version of ATSC, is certainly not a given over time. As of today, cable systems use it for broadband. Their STBs still have to be proprietary for the regular non-IP TV channels anyway. But if enough people cut their cable TV service, there's no reason to expect cable systems to rely on standard cable modems (for broadband only) that people can buy and pay for only once. Why would cablecos voluntarily lose that STB rental revenue? I don't believe that for a minute. They've gotten used to this way of operating. Some entity with clout has to enforce this sort of operation, if that's what you really want. Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.