On Apr 27, 2017, at 10:55 PM, Manfredi, Albert E
<albert.e.manfredi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Pai himself wants to eliminate the local studio requirement for stations. So
I'm simply telling Craig to look beyond the politically correct platitudes,
and smell the coffee. See this:
http://www.tvtechnology.com/nab-show/0026/pai-delivers-nab-show-address/280929
"He proceeded to enumerate some of the regs he considered obsolete, including
the main studio rule requiring broadcasters to maintain a studio in their
communities of license. The World War II-era rule was crafted to give the
public access to station personnel and their public inspection files. Those
files are now online, and Pai noted that the primary mode of public
communication is now electronic. The chairman also called out media ownership
rules."
Don't get me wrong, about this I'm mostly in favor. But it contradicts the
feel-good banalities about localism. It instead facilitates the development
of more regional nets, or with media ownership rules also the chopping block,
also nets with national footprint. (Which we have anyway, whether the
nonsensical rhetoric acknowledges this or not.)
VOD is NOT going to replace live linear networks that offer live
events and first run access to new episodes of popular shows.
Wanna bet?
As people cut the cord, which they continue to do, the lack of the old STB
will only accelerate the change. The comfortable majority of TV viewing is
ALREADY done on demand (61%, two years ago). The old STB was designed
primarily to tune into linear "channels," from a time when that was the only
game in town. Old habits might die hard, but once that STB is out of the way,
even old timers can figure out what the Millennials have known all along.
This is a brave new world in which copious content is always available, as in
a library. No need to make appointments.