[opendtv] Re: Evidence of confused legal thinking
- From: "Manfredi, Albert E" <albert.e.manfredi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 03:19:04 +0000
Craig Birkmaier wrote:
Yes, there is a glaring error here Bert. Your analysis of the
facts is backwards. The Supreme Court reversed the misguided
analysis of the 9th Circuit, which unsurprisingly you endorse.
First of all, the Supreme Court clearly stated that an "information service" is
subjected to Title II. So take that at face value, and show how anyone change
anything, Craig. You want to call broadband an "information service"? Go right
ahead. It changes nothing. Evidently! They said so!
Secondly, and more seriously, one has to be more than a little ignoramus to
think that web sites are "part and parcel" of broadband service, as one gets
from an ISP. I mean, ignoramus to the point that any opinion derived from that
should rightfully be voided, post haste. It's a bit like taking seriously an
"opinion" that the moon is made of cheese, eh? Simply, a false notion. Amazon
is not part of the ISP, any more than FTD Florist is part of the PSTN. PERIOD.
No Bert. A telephone call does not require any processing
If you totally clueless, maybe. If you understand how things work, it certainly
does. The acoustic waves do not travel over a wire, duh. Acoustic waves have to
be converted into electromagnetic waves, Craig. That takes processing. Educate
yourself before arguing!
An Information service as define by the 1996 Telecom act.
The Supremes said it's classified under Title II.
They were upholding the LAW Bert.
You're self-righteously jutting your jaw over nonsense. Give it up, Craig.
Bert
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
Other related posts:
