It will be interesting to see specifically which parts of Title II will be applied to broadband. For all the bellyaching about how Tom Wheeler was going to nothing more than the bidding of the cable industry, in fact it turns out that the CEA seems to be a lot more inclined that Wheeler, in that regard. I'm optimistic about this. Bert --------------------------------------- http://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=1325220 FCC Chairman at CES Takes Net Neutrality Pledge No blocking [of access], no throttling, no paid prioritization David Benjamin 1/8/2015 10:50 AM EST LAS VEGAS -- Tom Wheeler, Chairman of the Federal Communication Commission (FCC), used his annual appearance at the International Consumer Electronics Show (CES) to issue a ringing and unequivocal endorsement of Internet neutrality, essentially promising free and equal access to wireless broadband services to all Americans. Specifically, Wheeler said that the FCC is poised to use Title II of the Communications Act of 1934 to classify Internet service providers (ISPs) as "common carriers" subject to requirements that they provide their services in a "just and reasonable" fashion. In his annual "one-on-one" session with Gary Shapiro, president of the Consumer Electronics Association (CEA), Wheeler said that the recommendation to adopt several key sections of Title II, while "forbearing" to enforce numerous sections inappropriate to the Internet, will go to the full FCC on February 5, with a vote as soon as February 26. "We're down to the short strokes," said Wheeler. Most FCC observers agree that Wheeler has a majority of the Commission on his side. 'Just and reasonable' Wheeler's remarks to Shapiro effectively killed speculation, which was heavy earlier last year, that he was leaning toward applying Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 to Internet regulation. Under that standard, the FCC would be authorized to ensure that ISPs "promote competition in the local telecommunications market" and "remove barriers to infrastructure investment." Section 706, however, does not contain the "just and reasonable" criterion, nor does it empower the FCC to safeguard net neutrality "'Just and reasonable' addresses the conceptual structure," said Wheeler. "You've got to wait 'til February to see the specifics." Wheeler did, in fact, reveal a few significant specifics, including the fact that the FCC will actually apply to the Internet only a few sections of the 100-plus pages of Title II - very likely Sections 201, 202 and 208 - to Internet oversight. The passage of Section 201 cited by Wheeler reads, in part, "All charges, practices, classifications and regulations for and in connection with such communication services shall be just and reasonable..." For much of the past year, a coalition of ISPs, including telecom giants Verizon and AT&T, were united in the assertion that Title II will deal a cruel financial blow to the Internet and the economy. They warned that as much as $45 billion in potential infrastructure investment would go unspent if Title II emerged as the FCC guideline. In December, Wheeler offered evidence that largely debunked that claim, and foreshadowed his CES declaration. He noted that, despite regulatory uncertainty, broadcasters had flocked to an auction of government spectrum, paying more than $43 billion, although the value of the spectrum had been estimated at about $10 billion. Wheeler had a ready explanation for the spending spree. "For 20 years," he said, "Verizon Wireless, AT&T Wireless, all the wireless carriers have been living under Title II with appropriate forbearance [by the FCC] and have been able to invest hundreds of billions of dollars and build a wireless network that's the envy of the world." ISPs' dire predictions of financial catastrophe under Title II were further undercut by Verizon Chief Financial Officer Fran Shammo, who admitted last month at a conference, "We're going to continue to invest in our networks and our platform both in wireless and wireline FiOS... Nothing will influence that." However, Shammo reiterated his opposition to Title II, adding, "They [the FCC] do not need to go to Title II. And why would you go to a 1930 piece of literature to try to regulate a 21st-century technology? ... It really, really slows down investment and slows down innovation." No paid prioritization Wheeler's interview with Shapiro, however, clearly indicated that Title II is virtually a done deal. "We need to propose a rule that says there will be no blocking [of access], no throttling, no paid prioritization. We need a yardstick against which [ISPs'] performance should be measured," said Wheeler, "and that yardstick will be 'just and reasonable.'" As Wheeler noted, the biggest issue in the net neutrality argument has been "paid prioritization," the proposed practice of giving "Internet fast lane" privileges to services that pay the ISP for special treatment. Shapiro carefully walked a tightrope throughout the interview with Wheeler, repeatedly citing ISP concerns about the threat to "investment and innovation." Wheeler responded that he had thoroughly weighed Title II and Section 706 in the balance and determined that the economic danger is overstated, especially in light of the prosperity ISPs have enjoyed under the current Title II regime. He said, "The gold standard has to be an open Internet, and that's where investment ought to go." Wheeler also offered hope to "over-the-top" (OTT) programmers, who use the Internet to stream television and video content, allowing viewers to tailor what they watch to their own preferences. As the interview wound down, Wheeler struck an upbeat chord. "We live in one of the most exciting times" in history, he said. He called this young century the "fourth great network revolution." The first, said Wheeler, was the invention of the printing press, followed by the spread of railroads. The third was the advent of the telegraph and telephone. "And now we're seeing the marriage of computers and wireless," Wheeler said. "We're going to spend the next 50 years trying to figure out how we, as a people, as a nation, and how companies will adjust to that new reality... I'm pretty proud to be an American regulator in that dynamic." "The world," he added, "is looking to us." -David Benjamin is a freelance journalist covering the intersection of technology and society. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.