Craig Birkmaier wrote: > At 1:26 PM -0500 3/2/05, Bob Miller wrote: > >>What is the history of the 30 ft mast test? I have thought it was a >>standard FCC test during analog years. > > > Correct. And thus, since this services was to replicate NTSC service, > this was assumed by all to be the proper test. > And I personally consider the ongoing refusal to question this criteria as the single biggest hindrance to a digital transition. Requiring this sort of antenna is simply not a competitive choice for a very large percentage of the possible consumer audience. Whatever the historical reasons, it was a DUMB decision and more attention should be directed to it. - Tom > >>Was it part of the design of 8-VSB? Did the FCC incorporate words to the >>effect that a 30 ft mast test was integral to whether a modulation was >>acceptable? > > > Not exactly. > > The ATTC assumed this during the testing process, although there were > a few indoor tests as well. > > The FCC got into it when they did their own reception tests in the DC > area after Sinclair raised the stink about COFDM. The FCC test regime > was to send out trucks with 30 foot mast antennas. > > Regards > Craig > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: > > - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at > FreeLists.org > > - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word > unsubscribe in the subject line. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.