[opendtv] Re: Digital TV: Brazil to Adopt Anything But the American System
- From: "nat ostroff" <nostroff@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 16:02:37 -0500
Here is something to contemplate:
When a broadcast group (to remain unnamed) produced a 30 second spot to
promote their over the air DTV signals and HD a cable company (to be
unnamed) responded by terminating $2,000,000 worth of advertising. The
reason? The broadcast stations were competing with the cable company! Now,
given that kind of leverage can broadcast stations really promote their over
the air, non revenue producing, DTV signals? This is not a fable! It really
happened!
Nat Ostroff
----- Original Message -----
From: "Albert Manfredi" <bert22306@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2006 3:16 PM
Subject: [opendtv] Re: Digital TV: Brazil to Adopt Anything But the American
System
> Tom Barry wrote:
>
> >Manfredi, Albert E wrote:
> >>
> >>I'm simply saying that we have ATSC, we have "miracle
> >>chips" that finally work, so why aren't broadcasters at
> >>very least pushing to get these improved products out
> >>to the public?
> >
> >Because broadcasters do not sell CE products. CE
> >companies do.
>
> Tom, do you really think that cable and DBS companies would be equally
> uninterested and uninvolved in the existence, or lack thereof, of
interface
> boxes to their media? Or telephone companies?
>
> Do you really think that auto companies would think of marketing an
> automobile without knowing if the tire companies had adequate tires for
it?
> Just sort of leave that up to chance? Hey, we aren't tire companies, we
> can't be held responsible for that minor detail?
>
> Since we indulge in conspiracy theories so readily on here, why isn't the
> reason much more likely to be what Craig has often advocated? That it is
to
> the advantage of the broadcasters that OTA work poorly, so they are
> "guaranteed" access to umbillical media. And that their OTA plants are
only
> there to meet a bureaucratic requirement for the rights to the other
media?
> So let's not push for the corrected products to reach consumers. Let the
> ancient designs, expensive and inferior in performance, persist, so we can
> used our same old tired song from 1999 to get access to the other media.
>
> I can't begin to understand why last weekend, in late January of 2006, the
> best box I could buy in any store was a design that is more primitive than
> what the CRC tested, and submitted in a report, on 4 April 2002. This is a
> completely preposterous, and frustrating, state of affairs.
>
> For that matter, I also can't understand why the majority of stations
can't
> go to the tiny effort it must take to keep their DTT clocks half-way on
> time. I don't even mean within seconds, but is a couple of minutes, at
> least, asking too much? Is this evidence of "who the heck cares," or what?
>
> >And the CE companies obviously do not believe those
> >ATSC products exist that can be profitably sold at this time.
>
> I laughed out loud today when, in a radio newscast, I heard that some
people
> were going to be "forced" to watch the Superbowl in SD. Know why? Because
> many cable companies don't carry ABC in HD. Imagine that. Hey, how many
> spots have we seen where ABC explains to the viewers how to get access to
> their OTA HD feed? Must be that cable is the only way to get ABC, or for
> sure we would have heard otherwise, right?
>
> >They may exist on paper or on one-off demos
>
> They exist on more than paper. Yet, we keep hearing a retelling of events
> from 1999, as if in the interim, nothing had happened. The excuse given
for
> my having to buy a CE product some three to four years obsolete is that
> seven years ago, some comparison test looked bad for ATSC. How
illuminating.
>
> How many times have we heard broadcasters referring, in passing, to the
"30
> foot mast requirement" for ATSC reception, as if that were fact? Even with
> my obsolete STBs it's not fact. But hey, why not make a bad situation even
> worse?
>
> Bert
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> On the road to retirement? Check out MSN Life Events for advice on how to
> get there! http://lifeevents.msn.com/category.aspx?cid=Retirement
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
>
> - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
>
> - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
Other related posts:
