On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 14:32 -0400, Manfredi, Albert E wrote: > Kon Wilms wrote: > > > The modulation choice for this 'system' is a joke - cellular > > with multicast or other data-network overlay is the natural > > choice here people. > > I think the natural choice for info-to-population (i.e not two-way) in > crisis situations is a system where a small number of towers can > redundantly cover the market area. This describes a number of big > sticks, such as used by radio and TV broadcasters, more than a cellular > network. Knock out one, two, three, four, ... , and you can still cover > the entire area. > > Multicast overlay is great to avoid saturation of the cell net, but the > cell net still requires a lot more infrastructure to cover a large area > than a small number of redundant big sticks. > > We have no decent cell coverage where we live, for example. Only works > if you stand up next to certain windows. Knock out one of those small > sticks, or part of the net that feeds them, and we'd be out of luck > completely. Your entire argument is flawed. First, you have no business case. Try get money out of the govt. to roll out some 'big sticks'. Cellular providers don't have this problem because they have a continuous revenue stream. By the time you put out your big stick (if you ever get funding, laugh) dozens of cell towers would have sprung up to cover multiple areas. We can't even receive non-mobile television with the existing ATSC system. And forget mobile. Talk about useless. How many people do you think are on the road every day in their cars in the freeways? I guess they don't need to be alerted of anything. And those people in the densely populated cities sitting in skyscrapers? Nah they don't need it either. How many people are sitting in front of a TV or even close to one in a time of crisis (or any time)? How many people have a cell phone in their pocket? This is an argument you cannot win. As for knocking out the system - it would be much easier to take out the PBS bird, blow up the uplink dish (I'm sure only one dish is used knowing the level of funding), or jam it and bring the entire DEAS system down, than it would be to take out every single cell tower and provider in the country. It is a commonly known fact that if someone were to hit us with a nuclear bomb the first place they would drop one would be in eastern Montana or South Dakota. The weather would carry fallout to the entire east coast. 'Best bang for your buck'. Now besides this, no-one is going to drop anything out in the middle of nowhere where you cannot get cell reception. So you are quite safe wherever you are, Bert. Cheers Kon ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.