Please reconsider you reconsidered position. As enlightened as this debate might be, I believe that we've heard enough on this subject . ----- Original Message ----- From: "JCW0" <jcw0@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 9:45 AM Subject: [opendtv] Re: Channel approval process > For me the important question is how best to secure the benefits of Western > Civilization for Westerners, their descendants, and other peoples wanting to > join the party. > > The world, like Mr. Manfredi's bush is unruly. America, like Mr. Manfredi, > is best equipped to do something about it, and is drawn by internal and > external pressures to act. Acting, in both cases apparently, has > consequences. > > You can say with confidence that "Monroe Doctrine...has been very good to > Latin American nations". Having lived in Latin America, I can say with > equal confidence that you would not have to travel far there to find > thinking people who resent Monroe and other US policies and feel that those > policies have worked to the detriment of Latin America and poor Latin > Americans in particular. Dismissing them as leftists does not change the > fact that the resentment is real. > > By all reports, current events have greatly increased hatred of the West in > Islamic and particularly Islamic Arab countries. > > You trace current terrorism to the government of Iran of 1979. That > disastrous government came to power in a popular revolution to overthrow a > hated tyrant, the Shah, who was installed in a British and US backed coup > that overthrew a government that was trying to nationalize the oil industry. > > Al-Qaida, as an organization, can be traced directly to the Mujahedin in > Afghanistan who were partly financed and equipped by the US in their efforts > to overthrow the Soviet-backed government of the day. > > My point is that reshaping the world is fraught with unintended consequences > and inevitably leads to deep resentments. Liking being told what to do is > rare enough among people to be considered a perversion! > > If I ever buy my sailboat and leave port, I will be happy that the US Navy, > rather than chaos, rules the seas. The laying of the keel of the George H. > W. Bush, the latest Nimitz class carrier, does not make me feel much safer > though. Recent events lead me to fear the generational hatred of the > Islamicists more than the possible consequences of pulling back a bit. > > Having given up on shutting up... > > > > John Wrigglesworth > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On > Behalf Of John Willkie > Sent: June 16, 2004 12:07 PM > To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [opendtv] Re: Channel approval process > > Heck, I don't know even roughly what the US would look like if the US > returned to its founding principles of limited central government and > staying out of foreign entanglements. I would note that we rather quickly > abandoned it, at least as applies to this hemisphere: the Monroe Doctrine is > still in force, and has been very good to Latin American nations, keeping > Germany in the early 1900s from exploiting weaknesses in Colombia and > Ecuador, for example. > > I'm not a significant critic of the military exploits of the current > administration, however. I see this continuum that began with the adoption > of a revolutionary, expansionist, militaristic and terrorist government in > Iran in 1979 and their fostering of indigenous movements in many countries > similarly situated. Perhaps others see that as a given. > > I never took the Soviet Union as a given. While not a particular fan of > Ronald Reagan while he was in office, his "evil empire" (before the Nat'l > Assoc of Evangelicals) and "tear down this wall" (in Berlin) speeches were > like "dawn breaking over Marblehead" for me. > > Further along that time line, I see the attacks of September 11, 2001. I > think that the administration's response is the beginning of the end of the > continuum, or the lack of such a response as the beginning of the end of the > United States and Western society. For eight years, we had an > administration that was too concerned with 'good times' to pay attention to > these facts, so the attacks got worse. Seems to me that the period between > 9/11 and today is somewhat less troublesome as applies to domestic incidents > than the period that preceded it. > > I don't see this administration as causing any bad situations as much as > them finally dealing with what was extant. Of course, there are adaptive > behaviors on the other sides. Heck, let them kill Iraqis. While Saddam was > in power, who outside of a small circle of friends, gave a hoot? > > I had a lark the other day. Since September 11, 2001, more than a handful > of U.S. citizens have pled guilty to fomenting terrorism in the U.S. As a > item for further study, I thought it might be interesting to construct a > database of those convicted or who pled guilty, and see what political > parties, if any, these "Americans" were registered with. I should also > point out that I am not a member of any political party. > > John Willkie > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of JCW0 > Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 7:37 AM > To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [opendtv] Re: Channel approval process > > > I do not pretend to know precisely what the world would look like if the US > returned its founding principles of limited central government and staying > out of foreign entanglements. > > I do know that the course of the current administration scares the heck out > of me. > > > JW > > P.S. I am trying to stay shut up... > > -----Original Message----- > From: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On > Behalf Of Manfredi, Albert E > Sent: June 16, 2004 9:05 AM > To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [opendtv] Re: Channel approval process > > > However, U.S. troops are stationed in more than one > > hundred countries. The U.S. spends more on arms than the > > next five top spenders combined. > > Whew. That's a stretch. > > It also annoys me tremendously when my wife complains about > how I trim the bushes. I do it only because no one else will, > not because I'm trying to assert sole ownership or control > over these plants, nor because it's a pastime I enjoy. > > I can assure you, there are legions of Americans who would > prefer the US got its troops the hell out of all these places, > including Iraq. But the rest of the world didn't exactly > approve of how long it took the Clinton administration to > move into the Balkans, did it? Or how the US did not take > decisive action in Rwanda? I'll bet a goodly sum that the US > will similarly be blamed for "not doing more" about the Sudan > now. > > Perhaps the excuse "for not doing more" should be that this > isn't an imperialist nation. Somehow, that would sound lame. > > Bert > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: > > - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at > FreeLists.org > > - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word > unsubscribe in the subject line. > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: > > - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at > FreeLists.org > > - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word > unsubscribe in the subject line. > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: > > - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at > FreeLists.org > > - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word > unsubscribe in the subject line. > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: > > - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org > > - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.